I have presented some basic points of the analysis of the sexual structure to show that the final overall appearance of the "Christ-being" is not as a "man" or as a "woman", but as a whole new state of being.
      Since this state of being is not manifested in the form of the two sexual divisions, male and female beings, the reproduction or survival of its beings' species cannot be promoted by the intercourse of two such beings, but must, when it has reached its full maturity, be promoted by a kind of "virgin birth", which thus here means to say by self-fertilisation, which is again promoted through materialisation. However, I must refer to future analyses of this in "Livets Bog" (The Book of Life). It is thus true when Christ recounts that in the "kingdom of heaven" one does not marry. The connection of the Christ-event with "virgin birth", as thus reported here, occurs solely through the forthcoming self-fertilisation. However, this lies of course thousands of years ahead in the evolution of terrestrial human beings and will be an absolute impossibility as long as the terrestrial human being's organic structure still determines that it must appear as a more or less specifically male or specifically female human being. It is only the new sexual structure that can lift the man out of the "curse of sin"   "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread"   and free the woman from the same curse or this, "In sorrow thou shalt bring forth children".
      That the historical infant Jesus should be born of a virgin or should have come into the world on the basis of self-fertilisation is thus evident here as a total impossibility, since this organic condition occurs only in a weak, incipient embryonic state here on earth and is yet quite beyond any capacity for fertilisation or reproduction belonging to the terrestrial human being.