717. To assert that physical death or the destruction of the organism makes this future well-being impossible, by breaking off or wiping out the releases of energy that the longings represent, is the same as to assert that in every individual there can be found a preparation for a phenomenon that will never under any circumstances become a reality, since "death" like a catastrophe abruptly breaks off this entire process of preparation. In not one single case will this future well-being become a reality. But if that is so, what is the point of this whole process? Here Nature would be completely illogical and meaningless, and in fact totally powerless with regard to its own creation and would represent a waste of energy to which one can never ever find a parallel. Do you not think that it is the originator of this assertion that is unable to see the situation as a whole and that his holding forth is therefore illogical and meaningless, rather than Nature with regard to its creation?
      We have never yet seen Nature do anything that has no use and thereby create anything that is totally superfluous. Where is there any waste in Nature? Is not every single drop of water filled with life and living conditions for beings? Does not Nature transform the water from every gutter and sewer into crystal-clear drinking water? Is not living beings' excrement a vital necessity in the furtherance of all plant and animal cycles? Indeed, the very ashes from a fire, the chaff from a threshing machine and the slightest speck of dust from a beaten carpet cannot evade the law of logic, but is constantly classed as a link in the cycle without which all physical as well as all spiritual life would be an impossibility. Do you think that normal human wishes, longings and desires have less worth than excrement, sewage, chaff, ashes and dust? No, Nature knows of absolutely no form of lack of logic in its creation and consequently absolutely no form of waste. We have never yet come across anything so small or microscopic that it was outside the law and appeared as waste or chaos, and yet we have the opportunity of observing quite tiny objects compared with the gigantic star cities or clusters of suns in space with their oceans of worlds, globes or planets. What do you think about the cells, molecules, atoms, electrons and so on inside ourselves? Does not our organism exist because of these microbes' compliance with laws? And yet what does the size of these phenomena mean compared with the enormous size of the law-bound systems and orbits in endless space that astronomy has to deal with? Do we not calculate the size of these systems and orbits in hundreds and hundreds of thousands of light years? What is a piece of chaff or a speck of dust compared with systems or law-bound phenomena that can be measured only in hundreds of thousands of such units? And yet the facts reveal that they are not "smaller", rather that they are both one hundred per cent logical and appear according to a plan and in not one single situation can they fall outside the law of logic, that is to say, come out of the cycle.
      But if objects that are so small or insignificant in size compared with the other systems in space are logical, how minute or microscopic must they be in order to be identical to chance and chaos? Is it not so that here one's belief in chance and chaos receives its irreparable blow? Can life in any better way establish as a fact for us that chance and chaos are in the absolute sense illusory, and can therefore exist only as an "imaginary" contrast to the one hundred per cent normality that Nature reveals in its own method of creating, and that in the form of "intellectuality" it has made into the model for the creation of the living beings' most perfect form of experience of life? What is the instruction we receive in universities, schools and colleges other than a presentation of the intellectuality that mankind's foremost researchers have discovered or experienced in Nature's own workshop? There is no normal teaching or manifestation of knowledge or wisdom that does not present in a new form Nature's own method of creation. And there is absolutely no normal manifestation or exercising of will in the living being that does not constitute some more or less favourable form of copying or imitation of these methods. Nature is so intellectually perfect that no matter what the living beings might create in the way of imperfections, waste and rubbish, abnormalities and meaninglessness within their own sensory perspective, it can never ever result in chaos or absolute waste from God's perspective. Everything has a use, thereby confirming as a fact the biblical saying "everything is very good". A higher form of creative power and intellectual ability cannot therefore exist. But if Nature therefore demonstrates the highest intellectuality that there is, it can have only one specific being as its originator, namely, the Godhead. Nature is God's own consciousness.