Martinus: Livets Bog, vol. 4, sect. 1338

1338. It is of course obvious that such a "communist society" is not particularly popular within "political" parties whose members have reached a standard of evolution where they certainly cultivate "capitalist society" or the "culture of the bank account" to a greater or lesser extent, but, despite this, have attained a certain intellectual standard where they begin to realise that the individual's mental freedom and right to vote are an inevitable part of the road forwards, and where they furthermore, by means of the authorised tax system, even try to equalise or level out the difference between the economic upper class and lower class. But the development of such ideals is of course "communism". But such a mode of existence based on these "communist" ideals is not usually expressed as "communism" but as "democracy". A "democratic" development of society is thus in reality the same as a "communist" development. And any "political" party that has true "democracy" as its ideal or goal is thus "communist". And since almost all leading "political" parties of today to a greater or lesser extent aim at this goal, they are to a corresponding extent "communist". From this must of course be deducted any parties that have "dictatorship" or the "leader principle" as their ultimate "political" goal or ideal form of government. For them "dictatorship" is not a "means" but an "end".