Martinus: Livets Bog, vol. 4, sect. 1404

1404. It has been established as fact that the "something" that experiences cannot constitute the physical organisms or bodies in that they themselves are also an "experience". But if these organisms or bodies are an "experience", then "that" which experiences them still remains an invisible something that controls them, for an "experience" cannot in itself "experience". An "experience" cannot possibly experience another "experience". The most profound analysis of an "experience" cannot possibly be anything other than "something's" feeling of life. Pupils in modern schools or students at universities are certainly not taught that an "experience" is another "experience's" "experience" of an "experience", are they? Indeed, it may sound strange, but modern science has absolutely no other answer whatsoever as long as it totally denies the existence of a "something" that is not, and cannot be, a direct "physical experience". How this authorised science frames this answer is immaterial for it cannot possibly be anything other than a variation of the above-mentioned answer or delusion about the ultimate analysis of "life".